All Categories
Featured
Table of Contents
Key challenges include identifying and managing these risks effectively, balancing staff member needs with compliance, and adapting MTC guidelines for safe and cost-efficient movement. If managed well, remote work can be a tactical benefit for multinationals, using functional connection and access to talent. Relying on outdated guidelines could produce liabilities, such as unforeseen tax exposure and compliance problems.
Daida Hadzic is Director, KPMG LLP.
Words by Kevin McKenna, Elder Advisor, EMIR Mirages often trick the eye in the desert, promising water and relief where there is none. The Middle East, at the minute, can appear intimidating to international organization leaders who erroneously look at it as one uniform bloc. Unlike mirages, and despite geopolitical tensions in the more comprehensive area, the Gulf Co-Operation Council (GCC) economies' potential is no illusion.
Lots of regional leaders of global companies still struggle to unshackle themselves from mistaken beliefs and predispositions held by a global HQ that typically looks at the Middle East through a narrow keyhole. Worldwide budget holders' typically misguided viewpoints can lead to missed opportunities and prevent growth. With over a years of experience encouraging local magnate in the Middle East, I've seen how critical it is to make the case for the area by concentrating on these 5 basic actions.
This location also operates extremely in a different way from our domestic market, so don't expect the exact same linear pathways to development and timelines." This technique requires robust preparation, clear interaction, a deep regional network and an abundant understanding of the regional organization environment due to the fact that, eventually, you need to deliver on that assured growth.
By dispelling mistaken beliefs and engaging proactively, regional CEOs can open the area's true capacity, transforming viewed mirages into a sanctuary of chances waiting to be discovered.
Arrange a session with our professionals to explore how YCP can assist you in addressing your organization challenges.
Similarly, relating to Israel's questionable policies of restricting humanitarian aid into Gaza, the Trump administration has actually followed Netanyahu's lead. Israel's full blockade of Gaza from March 2 through mid-May sparked a remarkable deterioration in humanitarian conditions. In May, the Gaza Humanitarian Structure (GHF), an Israeli- and U.S.-backed alternative to the UN help circulation system in Gaza, started operations at four distribution websites.
Taken together, these policies reflect two intertwined components of the Trump administration's method to Gaza: a deference to Prime Minister Netanyahu's preferences and a deprioritization of humanitarian requirements. The administration has not pressed back on the Israeli federal government's strategies to inhabit Gaza City and forcibly evacuate Palestinians into a smaller location of Gaza.
He subsequently posted on social media that the only method to get captives out of Gaza is when Hamas is "challenged and damaged," seemingly providing implied support for Israel's expanding operations. The Trump administration's contented method to Gaza's worsening humanitarian situationmarked by a official declaration of scarcity in parts of Gazaunderscores the disastrous impact of its acquiescence to the Israeli government's refusal to offer sufficient help to the besieged area. They can best be recorded by unpacking how Israel and Saudi Arabiaeach with strong ties to the United Stateshave responded. Not surprisingly, their responses differ significantly in all 3 cases. Their actions likewise show the growing variation between these 2 regional powers as they pursue widely varying strategies for how to form the Middle East's emerging order.
Israel has not translated these military gains into withstanding strategic wins. For Saudi Arabiathe Arab world's present center of gravitythe imperative for economic diversification has actually sustained a drive to de-escalate tensions in the region, a push for post-conflict stabilization in the Levant, and aspirations to construct out commercial and trade ties throughout the Middle East and beyond.
As with Israel, nevertheless, whether and how Saudi Arabia translates its expanding utilize into lasting strategic gains stays to be seen. Israel was highly supportive of the U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities.
Moving forward, Netanyahu will seek to preserve U.S. assistance, specifically if Iran starts to reconstruct its ballistic missile toolbox or reboot enrichment. Israel has made clear that it will strike Iran againideally with U.S. supportin either scenario. Missing a clear U.S. "red light" opposing further Israeli military intervention in Iran, potentially coupled with a U.S.Progressively, the Gulf views Israel, not Iran, as the primary risk to local stability. Moving forward, Riyadh will press hard for a diplomatic resolution to Iran's dispute with the United States and Israel. While Saudi Arabia most likely is heartened by Iran's weakened position, it views with alarm the prospect of deepening interstate dispute between Israel and Iran.
Latest Posts
Navigating the 2026 GCC Business Environment for Leaders
How Future-Focused Strategy Reshapes the Regional Economy
How Does Business Excellence Crucial for Future Growth?

